Tables of Contents:
1st Post: Abortion
2nd Post: Gay Marriage
3rd Post: Drug Legalization
4th Post: Religion
5th Post: - - -
Abortion
The Pro Life or Pro Choice Argument
Firstly: This argument is ignorant and stupid to start and that's the start of this argument, it's stupid. It's an argument written by an idiot only replied to by idiots because for the mot part what you are debating isn't whether you are pro life or pro choice. We all are. I like living and making choices don't you?
The argument on abortion is whether you are FOR or AGAINST abortion.
Secondly: Don't post in threads which asks or protests whether you are PRO LIFE or PRO CHOICE. It's stupid and NOT the right question they should be asking.
Religious Sentiments
Primarily religious sentiment stems from the belief that an abortion is conclusively murder of a human life and that in murdering or provoking an abortion is resentful of god and gods gift of life to the potential human being. You provoke abortion you go to hell. That's the sentiment. And for a lot of people it's true. Some folks who had provoked an abortion wonder what their lives would be like if they had a child, and they wonder everyday. And that sounds very hellish.
Moral Bankruptcy
To completely obliterate abortion would be defiant of rights. What rights I can't say for certain. But people make choices. Sometimes the choice made is to have intercourse. Planing to have sex is different than planning to get pregnant.
Scenario One: It was rape. He wanted her bad enough to take her without asking. Everything he wanted and she didn't like it. She screamed when it was over. The police got involved and got the guy. He was a friend of hers and now on the road to going to jail. Some time past and her belly was growing. She wanted it out. Her parents said it was too late, that it was already a baby and that they wouldn't let her harm their grandchild. They preyed for her and the baby at dinner, relatives called and wished them well. They damned the man and somehow loved the outcome. Her life will never be hers and she rubs her belly at night uncertain about ever loving her child.
Scenario Two: The student who studies hard and is working hard for their degree becomes pregnant. She's a sciences student in a pharmacology program. She got in right out of high school with several U1 courses already complete. Not many people get the jump start she did and even less people get the grades for the institution she is enrolled or even the program for that matter. The guy who got her pregnant is going for his full medical degree in Cardiology and is nearly twelve years older than her.
Scenario Three: There was this party. She got drunk and nearly passed out. She saw him. He was hot. He was what she wanted. She let him know. They had sex in the bathroom on the brim of a sink. It was hot. They felt good. She got sick got and took a test. She told everyone it was rape but didn't know who it was. Her parents took her to the clinic to get an abortion. She lied.
The Endgame: Males have no legal say whether or not to keep the baby when they get a female pregnant. In a circumstance where two people have intercourse resulting in pregnancy the male stands as a sperm donor and nothing more. If the male is fourteen years old, with no job, and gets a sixteen year old girl pregnant and she chooses to have the baby at eighteen he has no choice but to pay child support. It's illegal not to. It's important as a male to take precautions when having intercourse. Always use contraceptives. The potential for life lives in the seed. It's a sacred thing and for the most part, even when it's for fun, sex should be taken seriously.
Gay Marriage and Homosexual Union
Heterosexual Marriage and Heterosexual Union
What's in a marriage?: Would you refer to a usual marriage as a heterosexual union? I don't. In fact I don't really think about it. I recognize married couples as two people who have chosen to live their lives together, or at east, that's what I her marriage should represent. For the most part they've had children and I see the couple as two distinctive human beings.
For the most part marriage is a contract. It doesn't cost a whole lot to be legally married, about forty dollars or so. You need two people to sign a testimony. Ceremonies are totally optional. Two blank lines that asks for the signatures, doesn't need to be people you know either. Boom. Marriage. A contract on heart shaped paper. To separate the two people from this contract they need more legal sheets and more money.
The Origins of Marriage and The Institution of Marriage
Ceremony, Matrimony, Celibacy, and Purly Reproductive Sex: The social, religious, spiritual, or legal union of two people can also be called matrimony, while the ceremony that marks the beginning is usually called a wedding and the married status created is sometimes called wedlock. The institution of marriage is an interpersonal relationship usually marking a public declaration for intimate and sexual activities in a couple. This intimate state is acknowledged on social, government, and religious levels as it is purely a bureaucratically based religious tradition. It is often viewed as a contract. Civil marriage is the legal concept of marriage as a governmental institution, in accordance with marriage laws by jurisdiction. The act of marriage changes the personal and social status of the individuals who enter into it as they become 'brothers' and 'sisters' in law to the siblings of their spouse, or, in the case of parents 'son in law' or 'daughter in law'. Union between a man and a woman as husband and wife is a monogamous heterosexual marriage. Homosexual marriages are mundanely referred to as same-sex marriages. In Europe marriage stood as more of a business arrangement between families. As it stands marriage was seamlessly assimilated into society approximately four hundred years after the alleged death of Christ. Since then marriage typically requires a male and female to have sexual intercourse to legitimize the marriage. Refusal to engage in sex on the wedding night is still grounds for an annulment as the marriage ceremony is to say without scrutiny - totally about reproduction, a ceremony to declare the founding of a family, and the public disclosure of two people whom seek to have sex and make babies. The Christian revolution created the foundation on a single man and woman to engage in intercourse with no others and to procreate. Thank you Jesus.
Homosexual Marriage and Homosexual Union
Why is buggery illegal?: a**l sex or sex with an animal in any orifice is buggery. And for the most part, it's illegal and it's buggery. Bum sex damages the rectum irreparably severing connective tissues. And the laws against it are basically trying to stop a**l vandalism by means of ''THAT DOESN'T GO THAT'' logic. Nothing more. It can destroy the thin membrane separating the a**s from the v****a in woman causing them to poop through their v****a, which among being painful can cause infections. Religious sentiments have created these laws surely. Fetishism goes farther than laws. Feels good man.
Why Homosexual?: Sexual preference is just that. All this nonsense about not being able to pick your sexuality is rubbish. Sexual release is derived by stimulus and thus what you derived your orgasm or sexual pleasure from, definably, is your fetish, not withstanding that it remain so. Which is why preference is a more concrete way of saying ''This is what I prefer.'' and hey, some like their sex differently than others. Homosexual activity make you sick? Well then you certainly are not gay.
Marajuana Legalization
Recreational Applications
Major Consumers: Who do you think would purchase more pot if it were legalized? Recreational users probably. That and if it were to ever to hit market it would have be called CANNABIS specifically because no slang would be unlawful to the narcotic. Bongs and pipes would either be wholly replaces with ballooning vaporizers or become pharmaceutical entirely. Stores would have to be very careful as to what kind of rolling papers they sell otherwise they would have to apply for a tobacco license.
Government Contracts and Tax Money
Farmers and Revenue: The seal on Marijuana legalization is that the legalization of the substance will generate jobs and tax money for the government. Legalized and government regulated marijuana couldn't be sold at it's street price it would be sold in packs, just like tobacco cigarettes. As for this job generating business... it doesn't take a whole lot of work to grow plants. Time, water, light. For a government licensed pot farm to grow twelve thirty five pound bails they would astonishingly need maybe three people.
Medical Applications
Of Cannabis: Pot heads sit on the legislative building on April Twentieth of every year preying to the plumes of smoke over their heads, hoping, wishing, and wanting ever so much for their drug of choice to hit legal standards and become legalized to a point where you can buy pot from retail stores. And from what I've found, these pot heads, specifically, the ones who don't smoke it for medical reasons- are not the sick people they should otherwise be advocating for. Smoke is inherently bad for you and smoking Marijuana would have to be prohibited still under circumstances of high prejudice because smoke as a medicine delivery system is hazardous to ones health and a medical oxymoron. That's the bottom line.
Religion
The Atheist and A Theist
Faith in Principle: A theist or an Atheist could tell you they have a set of doctrines. The theist to the religious as the Atheist is to the scientific (or otherwise).
To declare religious faith, tradition, and ideology ignorant as a whole, which a great deal of Atheist speakers, authors, and individuals do is a profitable extreme.
Tradition has it’s place in culture and culture has a place in history. Can it be said that science has a place in religion? Or that perhaps religion has a place in science? It
Religion is not confined to new ideology, objectivity, or skepticism the religious are. The greatest separation between science and religion is not limited to the dogmatic or pragmatic. It is solely the religious and the scientifically influenced who are confined to rhetoric, propaganda, and generalization.
A religion like a scientific principle is affixed to extreme conditions illustrating what is only of the utmost importance.
Life’s practice, what is it for? A scientific response, a philosophical discourse, a religious repose?
Is it a steadfast assertion that with any religious reference life becomes a repose? Or is it a happenstance justification to embody some kind of natural response mechanism to life, our universe, and everything?
A religious response is a reflection of the idealist and their morals, their personal justification is generally a faith based response of repression or religious expression. The religious response is immediately ignorant when encountering the scientific. And atheists use this as their propaganda.
Diversions
Extremism: It is in the best interest of extremist groups to employ specific niches to be filled by those without the posterity for extremism.
These niches should have a similar basis, but, have inflections that invoke a personalized sensibility to the parent notions put forth by the parent doctrines or teachings.
The personalized sensibility is the house to a greater sense of belonging as though through extremism an individual can find solace in insisting their uniqueness, their accommodation, and the assertion that the extreme exists purely so that individuals like themselves can derive personal truth from a fundamental doctrine.
The purpose of an individual to find a place for themselves just outside the wall of extremism is just as rational as living in the yard instead of the house. It is ignorance to the fundamental material that pushes niche followers even closer to obscurity. Denial is manifest in the ardent approximations that they are so desperate to perceive, as although they might outwardly transpose particles of the fundamental idiom but not the whole idiom itself.
Many theistic acolytes have derived their teachings from particles just as particle science does. The philosophical response can be any figurative liberalization considerable. The response to a philosophical idiom is a continual idiom. With an individualistic separation of idioms a stratification takes place between the parent idiom in which the extremist principles become iconoclast to the new less-extremist idiom. To do so a duplication of the parent work is made and the work is successfully perpetuated.
Extremism in any form is negative. Extremism is too much of something, enough something to be for the most part destructive to somebody - somewhere. And groups within society for centuries have harked in extremes to better fulfill their need to perpetuate specific ideologies.
Extremity is the sole ingredient and thus the only reason for a perpetuated cultural anthem to be manifest. It is in extremes that people find they fit best because a person is more prone to adhere to a set of principles than create there own, and with an arbitrary piece of inflection it can feel better to the niche follower to assert their position in-between ideologies as an individual. It is in-between extremes that new doctrines find justification. With an extreme a subscriber of a holy teaching or text can refer to a section as true while regarding another portion as fiction and as long as a particle of the work is accepted, the work as a whole will be perpetuated successfully. There can be no reference to the work without having the work as a whole perpetuated.
Topic Topic
Stance
Topic: Surf clam.
Topic
Stance: Oysters.
Topic and Stance
Stance, Topic, Topic: Lemmings.
Hey, Bibbly here.
I write, I make music, I construct videos, and I post on Gaia. This is my internet prominence and these are my hobbies.
I may use obscure symbolism that ou may not understand, but, through submerging yourself you might be scared to find you're beginning to understand what I'm saying. I encourage you to take a look at my works and appreciate all feedback, criticisms, and the like.
These are the wastelands of my mind.
 Bibbly · Sun Mar 29, 2009 @ 09:48pm · 0 Comments |
