Teh Bubblez needs das gold.
So she posts her english homework.
D:
If evolution can not be taught, what deems the theory of creationism suitable to be educated to the coming generations? It’s like you and Bobby doing the exact same thing, though it’s Bobby who ends up getting the cookie.
I believe that if one can not be taught, then why should the other. Why does society fancy pointing out just one part of the bigger picture? Do they deem adolescences incapable of establishing our own beliefs for ourselves?
In Kansas, they teach creationism from the Bible’s point of view. Should they not include the input of other religions: such as Tibetan Buddhist which believes in a diluted evolution, would they choose to censor that or not?
So she posts her english homework.
D:
If evolution can not be taught, what deems the theory of creationism suitable to be educated to the coming generations? It’s like you and Bobby doing the exact same thing, though it’s Bobby who ends up getting the cookie.
I believe that if one can not be taught, then why should the other. Why does society fancy pointing out just one part of the bigger picture? Do they deem adolescences incapable of establishing our own beliefs for ourselves?
In Kansas, they teach creationism from the Bible’s point of view. Should they not include the input of other religions: such as Tibetan Buddhist which believes in a diluted evolution, would they choose to censor that or not?